Deborah, a 54 year old woman from the Midwest, called stating that her uterus had multiple fibroids which have grown over the last two years, and she wanted to avoid a hysterectomy for personal reasons. She was having regular menstrual periods and lab work (FSH) showed that she was not yet menopausal, and was quite uncomfortable from the pressure of her huge uterus and heavy menstrual bleeding. An MRI was ordered, in which over 30 fibroids were identified. (Sticky post) Read the rest of this entry »
Uterine Fibroids Blog — An Expert Speaks Out
by Paul Indman, MD
Fibroid Photos: 89 Fibroids Removed by Abdominal Myomectomy
Four month check-up after Jan’s abdominal myomectomy
Today I saw Jan, who had her abdominal myomectomy four months ago. (See Jan’s story and photos of her surgery). Today her hemoglobin (blood count) is 13.3, which is normal and up from 5 when she first came in. She returned to work in two weeks and felt fully recovered in four weeks. Her periods are now normal and light. Her only regret is that she waited so long to have her surgery!
Comment: Many women suffer needlessly because of their fear of surgery. Most women find that the fear of surgery is far worse than the actual procedure. Many women tell me that their periods (when they had the fibroids) were far more disabling than the surgery to correct the problem. This is not to say that surgery is always easy… just that the solution may not be as difficult as the problem you are living with. — Paul Indman, M.D.
Prolapsing grapefruit-size fibroid — now pregnant after vaginal myomectomy
A 37 year old woman came to me in July, 2009 with a prolapsing 8 cm. fibroid. She had been seen by her HMO doctors multiple times for heavy bleeding, had 15 ultrasounds, but nothing was done. An MRI showed an 8 cm. (grapefruit size) fibroid low in the uterus which appeared to be prolapsing (coming out of) through the cervix. Since she wanted another child, she did not want to have a hysterectomy, which was the only option she was given.
On exam, I could feel the fibroid coming through the cervix and filling the vagina. Most of the time prolapsing fibroids can be removed vaginally. Continue to see photos of her surgery. Read the rest of this entry »
Hysteroscopic myomectomy eliminated need for hysterectomy. (I was told I probably had cancer). Outcome 6 years after treatment.
“My doctor detected a tumor as big as a softball, and he thought it was cancer….Well, old girl, my doc told me, you need a total hysterectomy.”
Read the full story… Read the rest of this entry »
Fibroid bleeding controlled by progesterone containing (Lng-IUS) IUD
Medical Journal Article
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device insertion ameliorates leiomyoma-dependent menorrhagia among women of reproductive age without a significant regression in the uterine and leiomyoma volumes.
Murat Naki M, Tekcan C, Ozcan N, Cebi M. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):371-4.A progesterone containing IUD (or “Lng-IUS”), marketed in the USA as Mirena®, has be shown to decrease or eliminate menorrhagia (heavy menstrual bleeding) in many women, and is proving for some to be a viable alternative to surgery. Read the rest of this entry »
From Jan, 5 days after her myomectomy
Read about and see photos of Jan’s abdominal myomectomy
March 09, 2010 was the first time I met Dr. Paul Indman for a second opinion on fibroid treatment. I’d been searching for the specialist in this field in Bay Area since September 2009, when I was told by my general OB/GN doctor my fibroid was so big (11cm by ultrasound and my tummy as big as 16~18 weeks pregnant ) that I need to consider surgery. She talked about the rapid growth of my fibroid (in January 2009 it was 8cm) that would possibly be sarcoma (cancerous) that I would need to remove the whole uterus. I was not comfortable by this conversation and just replied that I need to find a second opinion before I make a decision (I don’t blame my general OB/GN doctor in any means, in fact she’s helped me all the time for woman issue and helped me on my childbirth with a C-section in 2006). Luckily in the beginning of this year, I found Dr. Indman’s website and read all the articles there and found they all make sense. So I made a phone call to his office for the appointment.
I was already very anemic at the time Dr. Indman first saw me. My hemoglobin was only 5 (normally 12 ~16). And he diagnosed me with ultrasound and confirmed the big fibroid. So he treated me in two steps: first, heal my anemia first by controlling my blood loss during menstrual period and second, do the surgery to remove the fibroid. When the second time I saw Dr. Indman in about a month, my hemoglobin has increased to 11.3. The first step treatment seems very encouraging so we scheduled the surgery. May 10, 2010, I had my abdominal myomectomy surgery by Dr. Indman and I stayed in hospital for two days. Now I’m home and it’s the fifth day after my surgery.
When I’m looking back what has happened in the last two months, my heart is filled with gratitude to Dr Indman and his staff team. I’m very satisfied to the outcome of the treatment and convinced with his expertise and skills, his truly caring to patients. I know surgery is not an easy decision to everyone. From my experience, my piece of advice would be to find the doctor that you think you’re really comfortable to work with.
Sincerely,
Jan F.
Two Women, Severe Anemia, One had a Myomectomy, the other Embolization (UFE)
At the time I was starting this blog two patients with similar fibroids came to see me. Both were severely anemic, and one was hemorrhaging and in shock.
Before any procedure was done I received both patients’ permission to share their stories. At the time of the initial writing one had treatment 6 weeks ago and one 3 weeks ago. Neither of their experiences to date are necessarily typical, but I am following through on my commitment to share their stories.
Comment: (Updated 6-17-2010)
Yesterday was a difficult day. We did surgery on my first patient (who had the embolization) and found a high-grade sarcoma (cancer) which had spread throughout the abdomen. I talked to her about deleting her story, but she was comfortable with leaving it in. Uterine sarcoma is very uncommon, being seen in fewer than 1 in 500 rapidly growing fibroids. The risk of cancer is much lower for fibroids that are not rapidly growing. Benign fibroids have never been shown to undergo malignant change.
Could this have been diagnosed earlier, and if so would it have made a difference? Probably not. There is a single study in which a blood test coupled with a special MRI done with IV contrast rapidly infused differentiated between sarcoma and fibroids. To my knowledge this has not been confirmed by other studies, and by the time the tumor can be diagnosed there is a high probability that it would have already spread.
It is easy to overreact and be overly aggressive in removing fibroids because of the fear of cancer, which is in fact rare. We would be doing hundreds of unnecessary surgeries to find a single sarcoma. Yes, had she chosen myomectomy or hysterectomy, we would have diagnosed her sarcoma two months earlier, but it is unlikely that the outcome would be different. I was tempted to remove this story for fear that it would frighten women into surgery that is not needed. But I promised to tell the story as it is. Please understand that this is very unusual, and most women do well when embolization is done in appropriate situations. — Paul Indman, M.D.
First Visit |
|
| A 48 year old woman (who prefers her name not be used) came in hemorrhaging and in shock. Her hemoglobin was 4.6. (Normal 12-13). She does not desire to maintain fertility. | Jan, a 41 year old woman with heavy periods, came for her first visit, and was not actively bleeding. She was short of breath and weak, but not in shock. Her hemoglobin was 5.0. Jan would like to have another baby. |
Findings at first visit:
|
|
| Uterus the size of a 16 week pregnancy. MRI shows 9 cm. fibroid, mostly intramural but indenting the cavity | Uterus the size of a 18 week pregnancy. MRI shows 11.5 x 10 cm. fibroid, mostly intramural but indenting the cavity |
Initial treatment: |
|
| Hospitalized, transfused 4 units of blood. Bleeding stopped with medications. Started on medication and iron to build up blood, and high doses of progesterone | Started on high dose birth control pills to prevent further bleeding. Given medication and iron to build up blood. Was able to continue her usual work as an engineer until surgery. |
Decision making: All options, including UFE (embolization), myomectomy, and hysterectomy were discussed. |
|
| Since fertility was not an issue, she felt that embolization would be the least invasive treatment. Advantages: avoids an incision. Disadvantages: Average decrease in volume of 50%, is only a 20% decrease in diameter. Submucous fibroids may shed tissue and may cause a heavy discharge for prolonged period of time. |
As Jan wants to have another baby, she chose to have the fibroid removed. Given the size and location, I felt an abdominal myomectomy would allow the best repair of the uterus. |
Treatment: |
|
| Embolization (UFE or UAE).
A catheter is inserted into an artery to inject inject particles which will plug the arteries feeding the fibroid.
Below is from her actual embolization done by an interventional radiologist, and shows the catheter in the right side. The blood vessels appear black. |
Jan’s Abdominal Myomectomy: Large uterus fills pelvis to above belly button.
Fibroid (above) being removed from uterus (below) Fibroid measures 15cm. (6 inches). Two smaller fibroids were also removed. |
2 weeks after procedure: |
|
| Low grade fever, chills, vaginal bleeding | Read Jan’s letter written 5 days after her myomectomy.
Seen early for post-op check because she wants to return to work. She is off of her pain medicine, and can return to her work.
|
4 weeks after procedure: |
|
| Bleeding a pad every 3-4 hours. Uterus is now size of 20 week pregnancy, and is tender. |
At time of this writing it is not yet 4 weeks since Jan’s myomectomy. I’ll post her progress. |
6 weeks after procedure: |
|
| Uterus has increased to size of 22 week pregnancy and is tender. MRI and CT scan ordered. Results: large mass with large abdominal lymph nodes suggesting malignancy. |
|
Fibroid Causing Bladder Problem – unable to void.
My successful adventure in finding Dr. Indman was an interesting journey. In June of 2008, I realized I had a problem when I was unable to empty my bladder. After going to the emergency room and having a catheter inserted in order to empty my very full bladder, I visited a urologist who thought I might have had too much water to drink after hiking the day before. When a second similar incident happened later in the summer, the urologist was again at a loss as to what might be going on. He recommended I see a neurologist and get an MRI. Finally, it was determined that I had a large uterine fibroid. In September, I visited the gynecologist to determine what my options might be. Before this doctor had even examined me, he told me I would need a hysterectomy in the next month. Read the rest of this entry »
Uterine Fibroids, Infertility, and Pregnancy
Should I have my fibroids removed before I try to get pregnant? That is one of the most difficult questions I have to answer! Here is what we know:
-
Submucous fibroids, or intramural fibroids that indent the endometrial cavity (inside of the uterus) significantly decrease the chances of conception, and increase the miscarriage rate. Large intramural fibroids (in the wall of the uterus) can have a submucous portion that distorts the cavity and should be considered included in this group. Fibroids that are mostly in the endometrial cavity can usually be removed by outpatient hysteroscopic myomectomy (hysteroscopic resection). This should only be done by a gynecologist with extensive experience in hysteroscopic surgery to reduce the risk of scar tissue formation. Although it may be possible to remove some submucous fibroids that are mostly in the wall hysteroscopically, if they are large they should be removed by abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic myomectomy. - Intramural fibroids that do not indent the cavity appear to decrease fertility and increase miscarriage rates, but studies are inconclusive. Even if this is the case, studies are lacking to show that removing these fibroids increases the chance of successful pregnancy.
- There is no evidence that subserous fibroids interfere with conception or increase the miscarriage rate.
Fibroids in Pregnancy
Although we used to think that pregnancy causes fibroids to increase in size, ultrasound studies show that they usually do not grow. They often feel larger because the whole uterus is larger.
Some of the problems fibroids can cause are:
- Pain, which can be severe enough to require hospitalization. Sometimes a fibroid may infarct or cause pain because of decreased blood flow.
- Increased risk of placenta problems such as abruption (premature separation of the placenta).
- Increased risk of prematurity.
- Increased risk of cesarean section.
- Increased risk for post-partum hemorrhage.
The risks of serious complication are low. Most women with fibroids go through pregnancy without any problems.
Treatment recommendation for fibroids before attempting pregnancy
There is no way I or any other physician can make specific recommendations without evaluating you individually! These are general recommendations, and should not be followed without advice from your own physician.
If fibroids are causing symptoms such as heavy bleeding, pain or pressure it is usually reasonable to remove them. If the fibroids are not causing symptoms, the following are general recommendations.
1. Most submucous fibroids should be removed. Hysteroscopic myomectomy, when done by an expert, is the treatment of choice in most situations.
2. Intramural fibroids that distort the endometrial cavity should usually be removed before attempting pregnancy.
3. Intramural myomas that do not distort the endometrial cavity and are not causing symptoms usually do not need to be removed before attempting pregnancy. There is no evidence that removing them improves pregnancy outcomes.
4. Subserous myomas, unless large enough to cause symptoms, do not need to be removed prior to pregnancy.
Is myomectomy risky? This obviously depends on the skill of the surgeon. The risk of needing to do a hysterectomy at the time should be less than 1 in 100. I have never had to do an unplanned hysterectomy in a woman of reproductive age when I had planned to do a myomectomy. While adhesions can develop, there are a techniques to minimize them. All in all, myomectomy should not lower, and in many cases will improve the chances for a successful pregnancy. Be aware that if many or deep fibroids are removed (except by hysteroscopic myomectomy) a cesarean delivery will often be recommended.
What about other treatments, such as embolization (UAE or UFE)? Embolization blocks the blood vessels to the fibroids and/or uterus. Although new blood vessels my take over to supply the uterus, the effect on pregnancy is unknown. While there have been successful pregnancies after embolization, it also can decrease ovarian reserve or menopause as well as causing intrauterine adhesions (Asherman’s syndrome). Therefore I, and most experts in fertility, would only recommend embolization as a last resort in women desiring pregnancy.
If you’re reading this, you’re probably suffering with issues related to uterine fibroids (heavy bleeding, cramping, Anemia, fertility issues, etc.). I’m writing this because I used to struggle with those same health issues. Today, I’m back to living a normal life, even though I never thought it would be possible again.




