Uterine Fibroids Blog — An Expert Speaks Out

A 43 year old woman came to me with irregular bleeding despite being on birth control pills.  Her OB/GYN had inserted a Mirena® IUD 7 months ago, which failed to stop her irregular bleeding. During her first visit with me I did a vaginal ultrasound, which showed an almond size fibroid in the uterine cavity.   We did an office hysteroscopy, and saw the IUD resting on the fibroid.

The IUD was removed.   Since she was not planning any more children, we removed the fibroid by hysteroscopic myomectomy, and did an endometrial ablation at the same time as an outpatient procedure.

Comment:   The Mirena®  IUD (LNG-IUS) is often effective in treating heavy periods, but a fibroid inside the cavity can interfere. I always recommend doing a simple ultrasound exam in women with abnormal bleeding before deciding on a treatment.  Other studies such as diagnostic hysteroscopy may also be done, as only with proper diagnosis can appropriate treatment be planned. In her situation a simple outpatient procedure was able to solve her bleeding problem.

Dr. Indman performed two procedures for me at the same time – a hysteroscopic myomectomy and an endometrial ablation. From the pre-op to post surgery, I did not experience any pain or a single cramp. I was back to work the next day and back on my regular workout schedule within two weeks. After three weeks, I went on a cycling vacation and rode 350+ miles over hilly terrain. I felt great! Without the surgery, there was no possible way I could have done this. For the first time in 1 1/2 years, I am not experiencing heavy bleeding and checking where the nearest bathrooms are.

My experience with Dr. Indman and his staff have been nothing short of fantastic. Dr. Indman is a warm, caring, highly skilled surgeon – with a fun sense of humor to boot! He is one of those rare gems in the medical profession today – someone who truly puts patients first. I found Dr. Indman while researching my symptoms on the Internet. The wealth of helpful information on his website gave me a lot of confidence even before I met him. His deep expertise and decades of experience are evident from his thorough examinations and explanations.  — S.K.

Comment:  S.K. had a submucous fibroid, which was treated by hysteroscopic myomectomy and endometrial ablation as an outpatient.  Here are actual pictures from her surgery.  The first shows the fibroid on the right side of the uterus, with the loop that will be used to remove it.  The second shows the fibroid having been removed, and the third is after endometrial ablation.  I do the endometrial ablation under direct vision to be sure that no areas are missed.

It is not unusual for women to resume most normal activities within a day or two.  Careful patient selection and utmost skill are required for a safe and successful procedure. — Paul Indman, M.D.

Update:  12/14/2010: S.K. came in for a 4 month check after her procedure, having recently run a marathon.   She said that she kept thinking that without the surgery running a marathon would have been impossible.

March 9, 2010 a 46 year old woman came to me having been told that she needs a hysterectomy because of heavy bleeding from her fibroid. She wanted to know her options.  Ultrasound showed a tennis ball size fibroid that was 2/3 in the uterine wall and 1/3 in the cavity of the uterus. We confirmed the ultrasound by doing an office hysteroscopy, where we could see the fibroid protruding into the cavity. Read on to learn about her options and see photographs of her treatment. Read the rest of this entry »

Today I saw Jan, who had her abdominal myomectomy four months ago.  (See Jan’s story and photos of her surgery). Today her hemoglobin (blood count) is 13.3, which is normal and up from 5 when she first came in.  She returned to work in two weeks and felt fully recovered in four weeks.  Her periods are now normal and light.  Her only regret is that she waited so long to have her surgery!

Comment: Many women suffer needlessly because of their fear of surgery. Most women find that the fear of surgery is far worse than the actual procedure.  Many women tell me that their periods (when they had the fibroids) were far more disabling than the surgery to correct the problem. This is not to say that surgery is always easy… just that the solution may not be as difficult as the problem you are living with.  — Paul Indman, M.D.

A 37 year old woman came to me in July, 2009 with a prolapsing 8 cm. fibroid. She had been seen by her HMO doctors multiple times for heavy bleeding, had 15 ultrasounds, but nothing was done.  An MRI showed an 8 cm. (grapefruit size) fibroid low in the uterus which appeared to be prolapsing (coming out of) through the cervix.  Since she wanted another child, she did not want to have a hysterectomy, which was the only option she was given.

On exam, I could feel the fibroid coming through the cervix and filling the vagina.  Most of the time prolapsing fibroids can be removed vaginally.  Continue to see photos of her surgery.  Read the rest of this entry »

Deborah, a 54 year old woman from the Midwest, called stating that her uterus had multiple fibroids which have grown over the last two years, and she wanted to avoid a hysterectomy for personal reasons. She was having regular menstrual periods and lab work (FSH) showed that she was not yet menopausal, and was quite uncomfortable from the pressure of her huge uterus and heavy menstrual bleeding.  An MRI was ordered, in which over 30 fibroids were identified.    (Sticky post) Read the rest of this entry »

Should I have my fibroids removed before I try to get pregnant?  That is one of the most difficult questions I have to answer!  Here is what we know:

1. Submucous fibroids, or intramural fibroids that indent the endometrial cavity (inside of the uterus) significantly decrease the chances of conception, and increase the miscarriage rate. Large intramural fibroids (in the wall of the uterus) can have a submucous portion that distorts the cavity and should be considered included in this group.  Fibroids that are mostly in the endometrial cavity can usually be removed by outpatient hysteroscopic myomectomy (hysteroscopic resection).  This should only be done by a gynecologist with extensive experience in hysteroscopic surgery to reduce the risk of  scar tissue formation.  Although it may be possible to remove some submucous fibroids that are mostly in the wall hysteroscopically, if they are large they should be removed by abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic myomectomy.
2. Intramural fibroids that do not indent the cavity appear to decrease fertility and increase miscarriage rates, but studies are inconclusive. Even if this is the case, studies are lacking to show that removing these fibroids increases the chance of successful pregnancy.
3. There is no evidence that subserous fibroids interfere with conception or increase the miscarriage rate.

Fibroids in Pregnancy

Although we used to think that pregnancy causes fibroids to increase in size, ultrasound studies show that they usually do not grow.  They often feel larger because the whole uterus is larger.

Some of the problems fibroids can cause are:

1. Pain, which can be severe enough to require hospitalization.  Sometimes a fibroid may infarct or cause pain because of decreased blood flow.
2. Increased risk of placenta problems such as abruption (premature separation of the placenta).
3. Increased risk of prematurity.
4. Increased risk of cesarean section.
5. Increased risk for post-partum hemorrhage.

The risks of serious complication are low.  Most women with fibroids go through pregnancy without any problems.

Treatment recommendation for fibroids before attempting pregnancy

There is no way I or any other physician can make specific recommendations without evaluating you individually!  These are general recommendations, and should not be followed without advice from your own physician.

If fibroids are causing symptoms such as heavy bleeding, pain or pressure it is usually reasonable to remove them.  If the fibroids are not causing symptoms, the following are general recommendations.

1.  Most submucous fibroids should be removed.  Hysteroscopic myomectomy, when done by an expert, is the treatment of choice in most situations.

2. Intramural fibroids that distort the endometrial cavity should usually be removed before attempting pregnancy.

3.  Intramural myomas that do not distort the endometrial cavity and are not causing symptoms usually do not need to be removed before attempting pregnancy.  There is no evidence that removing them improves pregnancy outcomes.

4.  Subserous myomas, unless large enough to cause symptoms, do not need to be removed prior to pregnancy.

Is myomectomy risky? This obviously depends on the skill of the surgeon.  The risk of needing to do a hysterectomy at the time should be less than 1 in 100.  I have never had to do an unplanned hysterectomy in a woman of reproductive age when I had planned to do a myomectomy.  While adhesions can develop, there are a techniques to minimize them.  All in all, myomectomy should not lower, and in many cases will improve the chances for a successful pregnancy.  Be aware that if many or deep fibroids are removed (except by hysteroscopic myomectomy) a cesarean delivery will often be recommended.

What about other treatments, such as embolization (UAE or UFE)?  Embolization blocks the blood vessels to the fibroids and/or uterus.  Although new blood vessels my take over to supply the uterus, the effect on pregnancy is unknown.  While there have been successful pregnancies after embolization, it also can decrease ovarian reserve or menopause as well as causing intrauterine adhesions (Asherman’s syndrome).  Therefore I, and most experts in fertility, would only recommend embolization as a last resort in women desiring pregnancy.

If you’re reading this, you’re probably suffering with issues related to uterine fibroids (heavy bleeding, cramping, Anemia, fertility issues, etc.). I’m writing this because I used to struggle with those same health issues. Today, I’m back to living a normal life, even though I never thought it would be possible again.

Read the rest of this entry »

In order to evaluate uterine fibroids, we need to know what is on the inside of the uterus.  Many times ultrasound (or saline enhanced ultrasound) or MRI will provide the information we need.  Many women are subjected to endometrial biopsy which is good to rule out cancer, but useless in diagnosing submucous fibroids and polyps.  Fortunately it is easy to look directly into the uterus using a thin telescope called a hysteroscope.

With today’s tiny instruments, it usually only takes a few minutes to do office hysteroscopy using local anesthesia, and most women report little discomfort.  First I numb the cervix, which is hardly noticeable.  Saline is used to fill the uterus so we can see, and a thin flexible or regular hysteroscope is inserted through the cervix under direct vision.  I encourage my patients to watch on the video monitor so they will have a better understanding of what is going on inside her own uterus.  If someone is extremely anxious she can have something to help her relax during the procedure, but the vast majority of women do not need this and can go about their normal activities for the rest of the day.

Hysteroscopy compliments other diagnostic studies, so that when we decide on a treatment plan we know exactly what we are treating, and don’t wind up with any surprises.

The photo below shows an actual view from an office hysteroscopy.  You can clearly see the submucous fibroids on the back wall of the uterus.  This type of fibroid can easily be removed (by an gynecologist experienced in this type of surgery) in an outpatient procedure called hysteroscopic resection of fibroids.

The next photo shows a large submucous fibroid at the beginning of hysteroscopic resection of the fibroid.  The loop seen is what will be used to remove (resect) the fibroids.

Comment: I feel that for a gynecologist, doing hysteroscopy in the office is as basic as an ear doctor being able to look into an ear in the office.   What would you do if you saw a doctor for an earache and he or she wanted to schedule you for surgery so they could look in your ear?  Yet only 10% of gynecologists in the U.S. (who are supposedly specialists in treating the uterus)  do office hysteroscopy.  I see too many women taken to the operating room whose surgery is abandoned because submucous myomas had not been diagnosed by surgeons not prepared to treat them.  And many of these women are told that they need a hysterectomy because the gynecologist is not experienced in hysteroscopic treatment of submucous fibroids.  I’ll have much more in detail about hysteroscopic treatment of submucous fibroids in upcoming posts!

Accurate diagnosis of uterine fibroids is essential in deciding if treatment is necessary, and planning appropriate treatment.      While a physical exam may suggest fibroids, other conditions such as ovarian cysts or adenomyosis may be mistaken for fibroids.   For this reason, I routinely do an ultrasound examination at the time of the first visit when a woman has symptoms of abnormal bleeding or cramping, or if I feel an abnormality on examination.  Vaginal probe ultrasound only takes a few minutes to do, is not uncomfortable, and rapidly provides invaluable information if the examiner is experienced in looking at uterine abnormalities.  It is possible to fill the uterus with a liquid during the ultrasound (saline enhanced sonography or sonohysterogram). While this will often provide additional information to the regular ultrasound, I usually learn much more by looking inside the uterus with a little telescope.  This exam, called hysteroscopy, is usually a quick office procedure, that allows directly looking inside the uterus.    While vaginal probe ultrasound is good for seeing close-up detail, it may not “see” deeply enough to evaluate large fibroids.  An abdominal ultrasound, which requires a full bladder, is better for large fibroids but doesn’t show as much detail.  As the images from MRI are SO much better than ultrasound, and I can obtain an MRI relatively inexpensively in my area, I prefer to go straight to MRI to image a large uterus with fibroids.

MRI scans provide excellent pictures of the uterus.  MRI is especially helpful in evaluating a large uterus and helpful in planning a myomectomy.    Adenomyosis is frequently confused with fibroids in an enlarged uterus, and the treatment is entirely different.  I have seen patients who have been taken to surgery to remove fibroids only to find that there was adenomyosis instead, so they were closed back up without any treatment.  MRI is especially good at distinguishing between fibroids and adenomyosis.  If a woman is planning to travel a long distance to see me it is helpful to review an MRI (which can be recorded on a CD) to help plan treatment.

What is adenomyosis? It is one of the most common conditions confused with fibroids.  In adenomyosis the lining of the uterus infiltrates the wall of the uterus, causing the wall to thicken and the uterus to enlarge.  On ultrasound examination this will often appear as diffuse thickening of the wall, while fibroids are seen as  round areas with a discrete border.  Adenomyosis is usually a diffuse process.  If it is localized, or forms within a fibroid or a cyst it may also be possible to remove it.  Since fibroids can be removed but it may not be possible to remove extensive adenomyosis without taking out the uterus, it is important to differentiate between the two conditions.  A progesterone coated IUD, the Mirena, is often helpful in treating symptoms of adenomyosis without surgery.